The Magic of Sound: Rain Stick Resonance Lab – SCOPES-DF

Lesson Details

Age Ranges *
5-8,
Fab Tools *
Standards
1-ETS1-2
Additional Contributors

Author

Beatriz Torres
Beatriz Torres
K-12 teacher
Hello everyone, I’m Beatriz Torres, more known as “Miss Bea”. I’m based in Guatemala City, currently working as an Art teacher for American School of Guatemala. -CAG- . I’m passionate about creativity and innovation and exploring how technology and digital… Read More

Summary

This project combines physical computing with music, science, art, and math. It uses a micro:bit to detect the ideal sound of a rain stick and react two ways: “rain-like” sound vs. “too loud” based on a conversion from decibels to LUFS (Loudness Units relative to Full Scale).

What You'll Need

  • Micro:bit V2 (preferred for built-in microphone) with battery pack
  • Laptop/tablet with MakeCode (teacher-prepared starter project recommended)
  • Cardboard tube (paper towel or mailing tube) or clear plastic tube
  • Rice, small beans, beads,chickpeas (separate small containers to try)
  • Tape, paper, crayons for decoration, end caps (cardboard)
  • Toothpicks
  • Glue

 

Learning Objectives

  • Construct a functional rainstick instrument model.
  • Measure sound levels using the micro:bit.
  • Classify sounds as “rain-like” or “too loud.”
  • Demonstrate persistence and problem-solving by testing, troubleshooting, and revising their instrument model.

 

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

  • Students will be able to apply engineering design principles to build a percussion instrument that successfully mimics the acoustic properties of falling rain.
  • Students will be able to interpret digital sensor readings to determine if their physical prototype meets specific environmental sound criteria.
  • Students will be able to justify their design choices by comparing their instrument’s output against a “rain-like” sound profile.
  • Students will be able to document a troubleshooting process, identifying at least one specific failure point in their design and implementing a successful revision.

 

Reflection

Check our learning diary to read the reflection of each teacher:

 

Amaria Hernández

Bea Torres

 

During this stage we worked together with Amaria Hernandez another FabLab student and a colleague of mine at American School of Guatemala, she is a STEAM teacher for elementary and I’m a visual arts teacher for middle school. While working on this project she was focused on the engineering process of the lesson and as I’m also a musician I was also focused on the sound element of our lesson and how this sound can imitate nature and be ideal for this representation. We did some research on how the instrument was build and I had one at home that I brought to school for students to experiment and brainstorm ideas about its design. Amaria pointed out how the specific alignment of the sticks instide the rain stick was going to change the sound level of the rain sticks that students were going to build.

 

While I focused on the artistic design process, visual creativity, engineering construction, and integration of the Micro:bit technology, Amaria Hernandez contributed disciplinary expertise related to sound dynamics, rhythm, listening analysis, and the interpretation of acoustic qualities in musical instruments.

 

Her contribution helped shape the lesson by encouraging students to analyze not only whether the instrument functioned technically, but also whether it produced an authentic and expressive “rain-like” sound. This shifted the project from simply building an object to intentionally designing for a musical and sensory outcome.

 

The collaboration strengthened student learning by connecting artistic decision-making, scientific testing, and musical listening practices into one design challenge.

 

The Instructions

Research & artistic design .Duration: Approx. 1 hour

Students explore the cultural and physical origins of rainsticks and begin the external decoration of their instruments.

Engage & Research (15–20 min): Facilitate a brief discussion using the following guiding questions:

  • Are rainsticks considered “real” musical instruments?
  • What do you think is hidden inside a rainstick?
  • How do rainsticks produce their unique sound?

 

Listening Session: Play recordings of various rainstick rhythms. Encourage students to describe the textures and patterns they hear.

 

Rainstick Art (30–45 min): Provide each student with a paper towel cylinder.

  • Activity: Students decorate their cylinders using colorful tissue paper.
  • Teacher Note: While markers are an option, tissue paper is recommended for a more vibrant, textured finish.

 

Internal mechanics & dynamics. Duration: 1 hour approx.

Students focus on the internal structure of the rainstick and explore the concept of volume (loud vs. soft).

Structural Planning: Students plan the placement of the internal “baffles” (toothpicks). (30 minutes)

  • Technique: Ask students to mark dots along the cylinder and create small pilot holes for the toothpicks.
  • Critical Thinking: Ask: “What would happen to the grains if the toothpicks were clustered together instead of spaced out?” Emphasize that the sound quality depends on the uniform distribution of the toothpicks.

 

Construction: Assist students in sealing one end of their rainstick to prepare for sound testing. (10 minutes)

 

Exploring dynamics: While students work, call them up in small groups to discuss loud vs. soft sounds. (10 minutes)

  • Activity: Contrast a gentle rainstick tilt with a loud clap. Ask: “Which sound is piano (soft) and which is forte (loud)?”

 

 

Acoustic testing. Duration: 1 hour

Students experiment with different materials to find the most realistic "rain" sound.

Inquiry-Based Testing: Students investigate which grains best imitate the sound of falling rain.

 

Variable Testing: Provide various materials (e.g., beans, rice, and chickpeas).

  • Constraints: Students may use a maximum of two spoonfuls of material. They may use a single type of grain or create a custom blend.

 

Decision Making: Students must decide on their final “recipe” based on the auditory results of their tests.

 

Digital validation with Micro:bit. Duration: 1 hour

Students use a Micro:bit to scientifically measure if their rainstick falls within the target decibel range.

Preparation: Pre-load the Micro:bits with code designed to measure sound levels.

 

The “Target” Range: Explain that a standard rainstick typically falls between 20–35 decibels.

  • Teacher Note: Clarify that while decibels are the standard unit of sound measurement, the Micro:bit has been programmed to simplify these values for the test.

 

Testing & Iteration: Students test their instruments against the Micro:bit sensor.

  • L: Sound is too Loud.
  • Checkmark (✓): Sound is within the ideal range.

 

Engineering Improvement: If students do not receive a checkmark, encourage them to iterate on their design by adjusting the toothpick density or changing the grain type/amount.

 

Evaluation & Results

Evaluation Rubric includes the following aspects: -Functional Rainstick Construction -Use of Micro:bit for Measurement -Sound Classification -Problem-Solving & Persistence

Teacher can use the following evaluation rubric for this project

The Magic of Sound: Rain Stick Resonance Lab – EVALUATION RUBRIC

 

 

Standards

  • (1-ETS1-2): Develop a simple sketch, drawing, or physical model to illustrate how the shape of an object helps it function as needed to solve a given problem.

Lesson Feedback

Contact us

Having trouble? Let us know by completing the form below. We'll do our best to get your issues resolved quickly.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Email*
?